Montgomery, Texas, voters will soon decide whether to extend the terms of their elected officials from two to four years to better manage the city’s rapid growth and allow for more continuity in leadership. The proposed change, which will be on the November 6 ballot, aims to improve long-term planning and stability amid the city’s expansion.
MONTGOMERY, Texas — Voters will soon determine whether to extend the mandates of their elected officials from two to four years as Montgomery city officials continue to contend with rapid growth.
The decision was made following nearly a year of discussion among municipal officials, who have expressed apprehensions regarding the difficulties of completing substantial tasks within the current term length.
Photo source: Freepik
The city of Montgomery, which has a population of over 2,000, has undergone significant development in recent years. During their two-year mandates, officials have encountered an increasing challenge in making significant progress on critical initiatives as the city expands. Sara Countryman, the mayor, said, "We needed congruency just for a two-year term."
Countryman observed that residents and officials were equally unable to accomplish much.
An ordinance was approved by the Montgomery City Council on August 13, enabling voters to determine whether to extend the terms of elected officials, such as the mayor and council members, from two to four years.
This represents a substantial advancement. Residents can express their views on this issue by including it on the November 6 ballot.
The proposed modification will align Montgomery with other communities in the Houston area that have already implemented longer-term commitments. The elected officials of neighboring municipalities, including Dayton, Manvel, and Friendswood, are currently serving terms of three to four years.
"In four years, there's not as much change on the council side, so (any) initiatives can be seen through," Countryman emphasized. "And when somebody new gets on the council, there's still some legacy there that will help guide them."
During a workshop meeting in October 2023, the council members candidly discussed their challenges in achieving their objectives within the two-year term.
Council member Casey Olsen stated, "Essentially, we rotate half of the council annually." "It significantly disrupts schedules." A plan is initiated, and then, suddenly, three new members arrive with a new concept. It is exceedingly challenging to accomplish tasks.
Other council members also expressed their frustration with the constant turnover and the absence of continuity in leadership. They contended that an extended term would offer more excellent stability and enable them to concentrate on long-term planning and the execution of significant projects without the stress of frequent re-election campaigns.
In their view, the four-year term would allow elected officials to establish more robust relationships with their constituents and make more well-informed decisions by comprehensively comprehending the community's requirements. They also contend that a prolonged term would attract candidates dedicated to serving the city for an extended period and that these candidates are of higher quality.
Nevertheless, opponents of the measure express apprehension regarding the potential for diminished accountability to voters. Their argument is that four-year terms would restrict the electorate's capacity to express their opinions through the ballot box, which could result in elected officials becoming complacent.
Additionally, certain residents may prefer the current two-year term due to the increased frequency of change possibilities.
Montgomery residents will be confronted with a critical decision that will significantly influence the city's future as they prepare to submit their ballots on November 6. The result of the vote will determine whether elected officials will serve four-year terms, which would facilitate long-term planning and more excellent stability, or maintain the current two-year term structure, which emphasizes frequent opportunities for responsibility and change.
Montgomery's elected leaders have faced distinctive obstacles due to its accelerated expansion, regardless of the outcome.
The residents will be responsible for determining the most effective approach to meeting their community's requirements and aspirations as the city continues to develop.
.jpg)